BLOG Post New Entry
Serie A: Cesena 1-2 Inter Ratings
|
|
Castellazzi: 6
Came out rightly on Giaccherini and protected the post on Jimenez.
Maicon: 6.5
Good day yesterday. Pazzini needs to thank him for the cross but not only that, he also was convinced on defense.
Lucio: 6
He was the best on the field until Pazzini, but with one small regret: the cross of Ceccarelli passed him for the goal.
Ranocchia: 5
Budan snorted like a bull and Malonga kicked like a colt: the goal aside, it was an afternoon of grief and self-criticism.
Nagatomo: 5.5
It was an evening of emotion. He was looking and searching more than Maicon but he never could break the ice.
Zanetti: 6
Not a performance of a captain who takes on the team and puts it on his shoulders. One speed the entire game.
Thiago Motta: 6
He returned after three games and while he played at his pace, he did not look or expand for more movement.
Mariga: 6
He had the gas and it showed, sometimes even too much: picked up another yellow in two games immediately right when he came on the field.
Cambiasso: 6
Game number 300 for Inter. Energetic and geometry.
Pandev: 5
Played as winger and never won anything instead he almost always lost the ball.
Milito: 5
When condition destroys the will. This time it seems like as if he has lost the moment forever. And maybe a little bit depressed.
Eto'o: 6
Spent an hour of slipping the ball and shaking his head, but then restarted to pound on the left and provided the first assist for Pazzini.
Pazzini: 8
Just give me more crosses he asked, and it was done. At first he was close with two header that went off then did the bad to Cesena. An animal in the area like he demonstrated today.
Leonardo: 6.5
When there were no legs or ideas, he made the changes and there was joy.
Source: Gazzetta dello Sport
Categories: None
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
15 Comments
SacTown gets it right.
Cautionary tale on rating defenders. At Man Utd Vidic and Evra signed in the January window and looked like they'd never make it at United. However given coaching and time They've gone on to prove fantastic. Lets give Andrea a chance.
Another thing is that he is the same type of player like lucio (ignores marking and goes to intercept the ball at all times). When we had Lucio and Samuel we had Lucio to intercept and Samuel to mark players. Lucio and ranocchia together provided a bit less balance in the defence. However still far better than Materazzi and cordoba.
I'll say again, SacTown is not overly negative. He is a realist. This season has been a disappointment as far as I'm concerned. Moratti and Branca chose to sit on their thumbs and do nothing after Inter's greatest season ever. But even at the end of last season, there were signs of an ageing squad. Mourinho's defensive mind set covered up a lot of deficiencies and if you recall Julio Cesar's form made a huge difference. He saved Inter's asses more than once. Ranocchia is still young and can become a solid player. He definitely needs to improve though. His performance this season has been very average compared to what I would expect from an Inter defender.
FCInter says...
what does N.E.R.D stand for?
New England Red Devils. Am I right?
In the previous post, you didn't say Samuel as a better option than Ranochia but you say and I quote: "even worse than Matrix and Cafe Colombia."
Im no idiot, Ranocchia sure has great potential but he is a risk playing as a starter in Inter right now, just like Sebastian Frey
was when he played a whole season for us.
Im not hiding anywhere, Im just saying that we need a better defender then him to start with Lucio, and that is Samuel.
diaaz says...
Im glad it has been proven I was not wrong to criticise Ranocchia after his staring month. He is still far from starting material for Inter and right now even worse than Matrix and Cafe Colombia. Tell me I'm wrong again?
You're wrong again. Just because Ranocchia had a bad day doensn't mean he is worse than Cordoba and Materazzi.
Here are the three's ratings in the past 5 games:
Ranocchia: 6, 6, 5.5, 6, 5
Cordoba: 6, 5.5, 6.5, 4, 5
Materazzi: 5, 4, 5.5, 6 (only 4 games in the league)
And not only that, why would you want Cordoba and Materazzi playing? Both of them are OLD, and should stay on the bench cheering for the team. While for Ranocchia, he is young, better, and has potential.
If you want Cordoba and Materazzi playing instead of Ranocchia I guess you also want to see Kharja instead of Coutinho.
And no nothing has proven that you were right about Ranocchia.
It sucks that people who read (and write) on this site have resulted to negativity no matter what the team shows on the field.
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.